Social Media, Community Engagement, Emerging Trends
Technology and Consciousness, Compassionate Marketing<

 

Why Twitter Makes You Smarter

Filed under: Social Media Strategy — Tags: , , — David Passiak @ 8:18 pm

I developed my Twitter practices based on a decade of academic research on religion, culture, and emerging media.  Twitter can make you smarter if used correctly.  Here’s how:

Identify Relevant Trends

Publish 10-20 Tweets per day, a combination of retweets and originals.  At the end of the week you’ll have about 100+ to review.  Take time to synthesize what you tweeted during the week, and this will solidify your understanding of the most relevant trends – like writing short papers in school.  Aggregated information can be leveraged in writing articles, blog posts, adapting to PPT presentations, or any number of things.

Sharpen Judgments

Daily Tweeting helps to make concise judgments about what is the most important.  The necessity to distill your point into 140 characters or less forces you to think clearly about your audience.  Similarly, the short length keeps other people’s information down to a minimum.

Quality Filter

Don’t read blog posts if you’re in information gathering mode, skim them first.  Use Twitter as a first line of research, almost like a social bookmarking tool.  Mountains of information can seem mind blowing and overwhelming.

Determine if the post is “good enough” to share – each tweet you are effectively publishing something to thousands of people.  You don’t have to read every word of everything you endorse, just enough to decide if it is relevant RIGHT NOW.  Wait until you have time to review a few posts to decide if it signifies an actual trend.

Followers Serve as Research Assistants.

Each tweet involves a process of quality filtering.  Twitter followers are people that you trust enough to share relevant information.  Follow the right people and you create a funnel of information about news and emerging trends delivered instantly in real time.

80/20 Rule

I follow people who publish relevant links generally 80% of the time.  If more than 1 out of 5 tweets is a personal update or message to someone else, I stop following, unless I consider the person to be a real thought leader.  You have to make judgment calls here, but for the most part if the person is really important, someone else will retweet the best posts.

Lists are Like Focus Groups

Lists turn Twitter users into research assistants, and groups of them into focus groups.  My interests generally fall into four categories:

  • Social Media
  • Spirituality/Meditation
  • Innovation/Creativity
  • Current events

Lists allow you to segment information from trusted sources for quick reference.  They are also excellent to use if you want to find new people to follow.  Follow other people’s lists who are experts that you trust.

Beware of the Twitterati

I rarely look at my main Twitter feed because it is clogged with social posts from people who have 30,000+ followers.  I keep following thought leaders because occasionally I want to know what they are saying, but for the most part I only use lists.

Many Twitter users are aspiring thought leaders (myself included) and so they like to feel part of the community chit-chat.  Pop your head in before going to a conference, pick up some talking points for networking, but otherwise avoid getting caught in the trap that you’re being productive by reading someone is stuck on a plane.  Tune out the noise – thought leaders usually express their main opinions on blogs.

Stay Grounded In the Present

Remember, the Buddha says desire is the cause of all suffering.  Don’t get carried away trying to stay on top of everything.  It is impossible to make qualitative judgments on significant trends when you are stuck in the trenches.  You need to step back in order to move forward.  Adopt these practices and you’ll start to make synthetic analysis quickly and more concise insights – and over time, you will become smarter!

Rhythm and Universality and Short Thoughts on Twitter

Filed under: Cultural Theory, Spirituality and New Individualism — Tags: — David Passiak @ 6:58 pm

World Science Festival 2009: Bobby McFerrin Demonstrates the Power of the Pentatonic Scale from World Science Festival on Vimeo.

I stumbled across this video today and it made me happy.  You should watch it.  Bobby McFerrin talks about the universality of the Pentatonic Scale and how audiences always respond to it around the world.

Jump ahead and I come to reflect on a piece in the NYT on “Twitterology.” The author, Ben Schott, reflected on the 140 character messaging system and pondered that in the future people would come to tweet short abbreviations of words, much like they did with the launch of the telegraph.  His musings on words appear regularly in the NYT, and are worth a read in his blog

The connection Schott makes to words is interesting, as are McFerrin’s, but the more compelling I think are the ways in which language and music can be used in different contexts for subversion.  Around the same time that Morse was inventing the telegraph in the 1830s enslaved black people in the South would sing Gospel songs and encode secret meanings to communicate unbeknownst to their masters.

americanslaverymusic

In doing so they hijacked the religion plantation owners had used to justify slavery and laid the foundation for the vibrant spiritual tradition that would evolve a century later into blues.  It’s indeed ironic that centuries after the British brought slavery to the Americas their musical heritage would traverse back across the Atlantic to inspire the UK roots of rock music (check out the BBC video below on the influence of American blues on Brit rock).

It would be interesting to see what Schott, Professor at Cambridge University, might have to say on this.

Thanks to my former professor from Princeton Albert Raboteau, pioneer in the study of Slave Religion, for passing on his wonderful perspective on race in American history.

Social Networks and National Security

Filed under: Social Media Strategy — Tags: , , , , , — David Passiak @ 9:34 pm

picture-11

Britain’s new M16, Sir John Sawers, has been called into question due to information sharing on Facebook by his wife.  Entries exposed where they lived, places they frequented, personal details about family members, including a brother that is a known Holocaust denier, and his bathing suit of choice that led the Guardian to publish the story “A Spy in Speedos and Other Sartorial Misjudgments.”

The BBC contextualized the faux pas with reference to the man who coined Barack Obama’s campaign slogan, “Yes we can,” Jon Favreau’s posting of a cardboard cut-out of him and Hillary Clinton on his personal Facebook profile.

yes_we_can_twitter1

Meanwhile, secret forces in Iran have tried using geo-tracking of IP addresses and other targeting to pinpoint people sharing information around the recent elections.  The Nation’s blog provides an excellent coverage of how tweets, texts, and video uploads have spawned a worldwide counter-revolution.

Although slightly off in his vernacular with a reference that the revolution was “twitted” instead of “tweeted,” Marc Ambinder of the Atlantic provides an excellent recap of the butterfly effect and the potential implications Iran has for grassroots politics:

as Iranian authorities shut down internet servers, it allowed younger protesters, particularly those affiliated with universities in Tehran, to organize and to follow updates by Mir Hossein Mousavi; by spreading the word about the location of government crackdowns and the threat of machine-gun-wielding soldiers, it probably saved the lives of any number of would-be revolutionaries.

We don’t know how many Iranians belong to Twitter; there seems to have been about two dozen active voices from Tehran, but if we assume a multiplier effect — these 24 people can coordinate with their 20 friends — the use of the technology as a central organizing hub that circumvented official channels of communication cannot be understated. In this way, Twitter served as an intelligence service for the Iranian opposition.

Now TechCrunch, the Christian Monitor, and a host of others are making reference to the Twitter founders deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize.  Two polar opposite uses of personal publishing with drastically different consequences for national security!  Thanks to Jeff Malmad for originally alerting me to the story of John Sawyers published in the Jerusalem Post.

Twitter And Conceptions of Community

Filed under: Social Media Strategy — Tags: — David Passiak @ 7:10 pm

As a social media strategist I’ve witnessed firsthand the power of Twitter for the last couple of year, though I must admit I am yet to become and active user, in part because I have a hard time keeping up with all of my immediate contacts who are not on Twitter.

The above video is an interesting bit of social commentary on Twitter. There finally does seem to be a critical mass of people using the microblogging tool in ways that being on it become increasingly relevant.

I am curious what this signifies about online communities and our constructions of identity, specifically how sending 140 character communications provide a sense of connectedness and meaning that is not self-indulgent. What would Foucault say about all of this?

Social Meditate:
Home
About
Email
Connect:
Facebook
Twitter
Youtube
Share/Save/Bookmark
 
 
 
© 2010 socialmeditate.com
RSS feed RSS Feeds